The Delhi High Court has dismissed petitions challenging the Agnipath scheme, saying that it was introduced in the “national interest”. The scheme, which was introduced by the Central government in 2019, provides financial assistance to farmers for the purchase of agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, seeds, and pesticides.
The petitioners had argued that the scheme was unconstitutional and violated the fundamental rights of farmers. However, the court rejected these arguments, saying that the scheme was introduced in the national interest and was not in violation of any constitutional provisions.
The court noted that the scheme was introduced to provide financial assistance to farmers, who are the backbone of the country’s economy. It said that the scheme was aimed at helping farmers to purchase agricultural inputs at a lower cost, which would ultimately benefit the entire nation.
The court also noted that the scheme was introduced after extensive consultation with various stakeholders, including farmers, agricultural experts, and government officials. It said that the scheme was designed to ensure that farmers get the best possible price for their produce, and that the government was committed to ensuring that farmers get a fair price for their produce.
The court also noted that the scheme was introduced in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, and that it was not in violation of any fundamental rights. It said that the scheme was introduced to ensure that farmers get the best possible price for their produce, and that the government was committed to ensuring that farmers get a fair price for their produce.
The court concluded by saying that the scheme was introduced in the national interest and was not in violation of any constitutional provisions. It said that the scheme was designed to ensure that farmers get the best possible price for their produce, and that the government was committed to ensuring that farmers get a fair price for their produce.