The Border-Gavaskar Trophy has been the talk of the town ever since the first Test match between India and Australia began in Indore. The series has been full of drama and excitement, and the latest controversy to emerge is the allegation that Steve Smith found a loophole in the umpiring rules during the Indore Test.
Former Indian wicketkeeper Parthiv Patel has claimed that Smith found a loophole in the umpiring rules during the Indore Test. According to Patel, Smith was able to get away with a few decisions that would have otherwise gone against him.
Patel said that Smith was able to get away with a few decisions that would have otherwise gone against him because of the umpiring rules. He said that Smith was able to exploit the rules to his advantage and get away with a few decisions that would have otherwise gone against him.
The former Indian wicketkeeper also said that Smith was able to get away with a few decisions that would have otherwise gone against him because of the umpiring rules. He said that Smith was able to exploit the rules to his advantage and get away with a few decisions that would have otherwise gone against him.
The allegation has been met with a lot of criticism from the cricketing fraternity. Many have questioned the integrity of the umpires and the fairness of the game. The International Cricket Council (ICC) has also taken note of the allegation and is currently investigating the matter.
The controversy has certainly added a new dimension to the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. It remains to be seen how the ICC will respond to the allegation and if Smith will be found guilty of exploiting the umpiring rules. Whatever the outcome, it is clear that the controversy has added a new layer of excitement to the series.