Lifestyle “Supreme Court to Re-Examine its Ruling on High Court Jurisdiction in Alapan...

“Supreme Court to Re-Examine its Ruling on High Court Jurisdiction in Alapan Bandhopadhyay Case – India News – Times of India”

The Supreme Court of India has decided to revisit its decision in the Alapan Bandhopadhyay case on the jurisdiction of high courts. The case was heard in the Supreme Court in 2019 and the decision was that the high courts had no jurisdiction to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).

The Supreme Court has now decided to revisit this decision in light of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. This decision was taken in view of the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Supreme Court has thus decided to revisit its decision in the Alapan Bandhopadhyay case on the jurisdiction of high courts. The Court has taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court has thus decided to revisit its decision in the Alapan Bandhopadhyay case on the jurisdiction of high courts.

The Supreme Court has thus taken a step towards ensuring that justice is served in the best possible manner. The Court has taken into consideration the fact that the CAT has been given the power to hear appeals against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court has thus taken a step towards ensuring that justice is served in the best possible manner. The Court has thus taken a step towards ensuring that justice is served in the best possible manner.

Exit mobile version