The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the Punjab Governor had no discretion to delay the summoning of the state assembly. The ruling was made in response to a petition filed by the Punjab government, which had sought the court’s intervention in the matter.
The court noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court further noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court also noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court also noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court also noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court also noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court also noted that the Governor had no power to delay the summoning of the assembly, as it was the prerogative of the state government to do so. The court also noted that the Governor had no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government.
The court’s ruling is a major victory for the state government, as it reaffirms the principle of separation of powers between the state government and the Governor. The ruling also serves as a reminder to the Governor that he has no power to interfere in the functioning of the state government. This ruling will ensure that the state government is able to exercise its prerogative to summon the assembly without any interference from the Governor.